The Beginning After the End Season 2 Review: Expectations vs Reality

Did the second season deliver the growth viewers were waiting for?

HomeAnimeThe Beginning After the End Season 2 Review: Expectations vs Reality
The Beginning After the End Season 2 Review: Expectations vs Reality

The Beginning After the End Season 2 arrived on April 1, 2026 after a first season that had already generated debate around its adaptation. Crunchyroll confirmed the second season for spring 2026, and the series ultimately finished with 12 episodes. Studio A-CAT returned, with Keitaro Motonaga directing.

What people expected

The biggest expectation was improvement. The anime is adapted from TurtleMe's fantasy story, and the lead character Arthur Leywin had already built a large online following through the original material. After Season 1, viewers who wanted stronger execution were hoping Season 2 would make better use of Arthur's adventure, improve pacing and give the fantasy world more dramatic momentum.

That expectation was visible even before the premiere. In 2025, creator TurtleMe said growth was a major focus around the production of Season 2 and expressed hope that the work would show on screen.

How it actually went

Season 2 did show a broader adventure structure. The official Fuji TV synopsis has Arthur working with Jasmine on quests before accepting a mission from the AA-ranked adventurer Brald, while the official season description builds toward a major tragedy and then Arthur's next stage of development.

Audience data suggests the response remained mixed. AniList currently lists an average score of 64% for Season 2, while a separate MyAnimeList-derived tracker shows 6.53/10 from more than 34,000 users. Rotten Tomatoes has no critic score for the season and fewer than 50 audience ratings, with some user reviews criticizing the execution and pacing.

IMDb's episode ratings show an interesting pattern: the season's episodes are listed from 5.6/10 for Episode 1 up to 7.4/10 for Episode 10, before ending at 7.1 for Episode 12. That indicates that some viewers rated later episodes more favorably than the opening stretch, although IMDb ratings are user submissions and can change over time.

What worked

The sequel gave Arthur more room to operate as an adventurer rather than keeping the story focused only on setup. The official synopsis emphasizes quests, sword and mana training, and the transition toward the academy. That makes the second season feel more like a progression into the wider world of the franchise.

The later-episode IMDb pattern also suggests that some viewers found the story more engaging as the season moved forward. That is not the same as saying the series had a universal turnaround, but it helps explain why discussion around the sequel is more mixed than a simple “same as Season 1” description would suggest.

Where expectations were still difficult to satisfy

The recurring criticism is execution rather than premise. Some audience reviewers felt that the adaptation still did not present its story with the urgency or polish they expected. With no critic aggregate on Rotten Tomatoes and limited audience sampling there, the available public data is better read as a snapshot of disagreement than as a definitive verdict.

The season's 12-episode structure also leaves plenty of source material untouched. Fans coming from the web novel or webtoon can therefore judge the anime not only as a television show but against a much larger version of Arthur's story.

Final takeaway

Season 2 was built around the promise of growth, and the evidence suggests a mixed outcome rather than a single consensus. The adventure expands, several later episodes score better with IMDb users, yet aggregate audience scores remain well below the level of a universally acclaimed sequel. For viewers deciding whether to continue, the most useful context is that the season changes the scale of Arthur's journey while still attracting criticism over adaptation execution.

Sources

Fuji TV official season page · AniList · IMDb ratings